Latest Posts

This cryptocurrency trading software rocks!

I am bowled over with the consistency of this software:

In my two and a half years of trading online, there has barely been a time when I have been consistently happy with any particular software for a prolonged period of saying even six months. a software that can be perfectly legit at the beginning that is when you open a trading account with them can turn juvenile at any point of time and gobble away all the hard earned money. However, this wonderful trading software called the Bitcoin Loophole by Steve Mckay has impressed me by staying legit for almost 20 months now.

That itself is impressive on all counts:

Any trading software that stays legit for a period as long as that has to be a genuine one on all counts. There are no two things about it. Apart from the fact that I have not been scammed by this wondrous platform, it also has the rare distinction of being the most secure and safe platform in terms of personal and financial data security.

Data security is high priority:

Today, data security is counted as the number one concern of any global organization. The fact that this software goes an extra mile in ensuring that the personal and the financial data of the trader is secure goes to prove that it is very serious about its job.

I saw results from the very first day:

It is equally rare to start seeing results for m day one itself. I have been to dozens of websites that have attractive sales pitches. They will offer to give you the sun, the moon even the stars as profits but their promises are all empty. It always reminds of the saying “empty vessels make the most noise” when I am reading such flowery and convincing sales talk on the homepages of these scammer websites.

On the contrary, this website does nothing of that sort. It will tell you that it deals in cryptocurrency and the facts like they should be stated. There is no sales pitch and convincing talking you into signing up with them at all!

The demo account:

The demo account is another case in point. The website is bent on the fact that any newcomer must be well informed about trading in cryptocurrency before he even invests his own money and takes the plunge. That is why a demo account facility is provided on the website that will help him in brushing up on the basics. You can check out the website yourself. In fact, you will be quite impressed when you see this site yourself.

Back to the Frontlines

frontlinesv2

I took a break from my life of tireless activism in the Free State to visit my former home of Arizona. I was soon reminded of why I left, why I went Galt.

People the world over remain preoccupied with survival. With finances. With hobbies and fulfillment. And, most importantly, with the eternal quest for meaning. An unlucky few of us see the world as it is, in a state of slavery and oppression. Yet, we are powerless to change that unfortunate human condition. And so we are forced to live out our constant quest for fulfillment, only with the added weight of knowing the world to be fallen.

Returning to the home soil after years of struggle in a foreign land is liberating, yet reminds you of the hardships. Bitcoin Trader should be just considered as another  software in the crypto trading club, but the result is amazing.

That was me most of my young professional life, only I lacked the realism to give up on the world. When all my aspirations for success in love and labor fell away, all I had left were dreams of a better tomorrow. Instead of attempting one last futile grasp at what I had lost, I made a desperate search for the frontlines of liberty, to spend what was left of my life in service to a mad dream.

How did that desperate stand pan out? The best way to judge that is to see what happened when I tried to step back into my old life.

The short version is that I couldn’t go back. Too much had changed, and it saddened me to see old friends and colleagues in the same jaded scramble for a better version of nothing special. Never before was the distinction between existing and living so clear, and I was grateful to be a member of the second category.

The truth is, some elements of New Hampshire are an idea boom town. People with radical ways of thinking and even more radical passion are moving from across the world to the one place humanity can make a stand for a bright future. While the rest of the world remains preoccupied with making its jail cells more comfortable, in the Free State people are clawing an escape tunnel out of the very granite. What I experienced by visiting my former home was hope withdrawal.

And as I write this I’m returning to my new home, and will barely have set foot on New Hampshire soil before I rejoin my activist brethren in the struggle against oppression.

Don’t Fall for “Free Speech Socialism”

White nationalism is the controversy du jour in the United States, as elements of the alt-right have made headlines for violent rallies and clashes with counter-protesters. While free speech is protected in the United States, a growing list of companies and social media platforms have begun to refuse the business of Nazi sympathizers, drawing criticisms and accusations of squelching free speech. This idea that the right to hateful expression extends beyond government behavior is what I like to call “free speech socialism,” and shouldn’t be tolerated in a free society. No, Facebook doesn’t need to keep Nazis’ accounts active. Here’s why.

“Free speech” as we know it is a government invention

Let’s not forget that the primary purpose of the modern concept of free speech was to keep the government in check. We are all naturally free to speak our minds until someone comes and bashes our head in because they don’t like what we’re saying. The common concept of free speech refers to the gist of the 1st Amendment of the American constitution, that government can’t oppress the people for expressing unpopular or dangerous views. That right to free speech is precious, but remember: it’s about preventing violence from being used to silence you, not giving you a mandatory platform from which to speak freely. That part is your responsibility.

Art of speaking you mind out is very diverging topic today, you may be politically right but one cannot have the right of free speech everywhere. Social media is out there where publically ranting is on a high, however they are often schooled to mellow down on their attitude to cry out aloud on matters which they feel is unjust, reading the full article will give an insight on how this person became a millionaire introducing a digital currency to trade and exchange for physical currency.

Mandated “free speech” doesn’t apply to private companies

Here’s where we get into some different territory: private property. In your own home or business using your own property, as well as in public, you are free to express whatever views you see fit. However, when you enter someone else’s home, they can kick you out if they see fit, particularly if you’re expressing views they consider to be abhorrent. The same largely applies to businesses with the right to refuse service to anyone, as well as platforms run by for-profit companies which include terms of service. No one is owed a Twitter account, and if you conduct yourself in such a way on that platform that its operators decide to remove you, there’s no room for justified outrage. Free speech hasn’t been abridged, private companies and individuals have simply exercised their choice of customers and associates.

Provocateurs thrive on “speech redistribution”

Here’s where the term “free speech socialism” comes in. Remember, in a truly free society you aren’t entitled to the fruits of someone else’s labor. Companies, including those providing a platform for facilitated speech, are the product of someone’s labor. They do not have customers and users out of some sense of public duty, they have them because they choose to, because such a relationship is mutually beneficial. When that relationship is no longer beneficial to one or more of the parties involved, it tends to get scrapped. Any sense of lasting outrage at being boycotted by a private business over controversial views is, in fact, a sense of entitlement to the fruits of someone else’s labor. Arguing for companies who disagree with you to be forced to provide a platform for your speech is advocating for redistribution of resources, giving you a guaranteed use of something you didn’t work for. There’s a word for that: socialism.

The most provocative elements of modern political discourse (predominantly neo-Nazi groups, though certainly not exclusively) take advantage of free speech sympathy to demand a platform from those they detest. In general, trolls and other undesirables fiercely demand protection from the rules they themselves flaunt, thriving on the wager that other people will follow the restrictions they won’t. Groups advocating for the silencing, removal, and straight up murder of dissidents not only claim the right for their hated point of view to be heard while advocating for the removal of this right for others, but want others to be forced to subsidize their speech for free. This is because they’re weak, their cause is weak, and they know they would never have a platform for their hate if they had to earn it and build it themselves. So instead, they pursue redistribution of resources in their favor. Remember, national socialists remain, at their core, socialists.

The speech debate all too often ignores the public/private divide

The whole argument over whether or not “we” should allow certain kinds of speech blurs the line between public and private policy. “We” as a nation-state should absolutely allow all kinds of abhorrent speech, but we as individuals and businesses should allow what we see fit. This is the best we can do at this point in time, but in a truly free market this issue wouldn’t exist at all. Without hard and fast government-enforced rules, the “free speech” defense wouldn’t apply at all, and people would simply decide for themselves whether or not to humor toxic viewpoints. In the mythical libertarian utopia, Nazis would likely have so few options available to them as far as businesses to patronize and platforms and areas for speech that the philosophy would all but die out. In a way, government involvement is all that’s preventing that from happening currently.

The next time you see a Nazi, Klansman, or other clear-cut undesirable whining about being cut off from using a particular service, remember that this is in no way a threat to free speech, but a threat to involuntarily subsidized speech. And that, in my opinion, deserves to be threatened, if not exterminated entirely.

Twitter Cracks Down on Terrorism, Bullying

Twitter

Twitter has axed another 235,000 accounts for promoting terrorism.

Over the last six months, the social media giant has added hundreds of thousands of banned accounts to its 360,000 ban total since about this time last year. This cleanup move has earned praise from the Anti-Defamation League, an organization protesting antisemitism and bigotry against the Jewish people.

Alt-right troll Milo claims credit for the Twitter terror purge

Meanwhile, alt-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos, himself one of the fallen, claimed creditfor Twitter’s recent cleanup, citing his prior highlighting of terrorist organizations’ use of the social media platform.

Yiannopoulos was permanently banned from Twitter earlier this year for allegedly inciting bullying and racial hatred against an African-American actress, so it may be a stretch to allege that Twitter executives hold his opinions in high regard.

 

A gradual end to limitless expression across free-of-charge platforms

Twitter’s recent cleanup actions are part of a greater trend in social media companies to establish clearer boundaries as to what kind of content is fitting to their platforms, ending a “Wild West” era of free content with virtually limitless expression possibilities. Now that social media is so widespread that it’s almost a given, platforms feel less need to adopt a “we need everyone” strategy, and have shifted to one of constructing a more positive environment.

Equally fascinating is the reaction to new content standards by the public at large, and what that means for the understanding of free speech property rights.

The environment for trading platforms is actually stricter and more secure. The systems have to be efficient for people to like them and use them efficiently. However, it is indispensable that they follow the security protocols set by the regulating authorities to function in the financial market. The programs will not be allowed to operate and may be banned if they do not have licensed brokers.

In spite of all these regulations in place, there are very few developers who follow the rules and stick to the rule book. Read more at this website, https://top10cryptorobots.com/, to find out about safe and secure trading programs.

Coming back to the article about online freedom. When the guaranteed right of free expression is broadcast through a private company with thousands of employees which chooses to make its services available to the public free of charge, it’s easy to make the mistake of assuming any right to expression whatsoever through that platform. In reality, you are entitled solely to the free expression you yourself can express with your own capacities and resources. Everything else is by the good graces of others.

US Army’s Accounting Off By Trillions of Dollars

army paperwork

The US Army’s accounting department messed up big-time last year. How big? To the tune of $6.5 trillion. Oopsie.

According to a Pentagon audit performed by the Inspector General’s office of the Defense Department, the Army could not provide basic accounting information such as receipts and invoices for enough spending that trillions of dollars of accounting adjustments had to be made.

However, when a small trading website is launched by sincere developers, they take care of each dollar invested by their customers. There are only a few reliable robotic trading systems that ensure complete transparency in their functioning and all the services are provided free of charge. These operate using only legitimate brokers and their robots are designed to work efficiently for a specific trading system, for example, digital currency, Forex or CFD etc. The robots keep producing signals by analyzing the trends across the world. After all, the investors trust a program and its developers to make the system secure and easy for all the investors.  But in the accounts of Army,

For reference, that total error number is about 30 times the Army’s total budget.

Like most government programs, the US military is a champion of waste

These accounting snags should come as no surprise to someone familiar with the US military’s workings over the past several decades. Defense spending boomed during the Cold War to counter the perpetual Soviet threat of annihilation, and yet continued to grow after the USSR fell and the US was left without major nemeses.

And where’s all that defense spending going? To ridiculous things, of course. Recent prominent examples include a $43 million gas station in Afghanistan, which of course isn’t even functional, and $500 million spent on recruiting and training rebels in Syria, which yielded an impressive crop of about 5 fighters, or about $100 million per man.

Trying to cut wasteful military spending is political suicide

Despite these spectacular examples of waste, the US military spending machine is surprisingly hard to reduce. Congress can’t get a budget through without including even more increases to defense spending. Even Mr. “Say-What-He-Thinks” Trump has backed off claims made earlier in the election cycle that he would reign in military spending.

And although the Pentagon continues to spend as a drunken sailor, the rest of the world, even in the most militaristic countries, just isn’t keeping up. US military spending accounted for 37% of 2015’s $1.6 trillion total. This means that if the US didn’t have a military, it would have enough spending left to buy more than half of the remaining $1 trillion military of the combined rest of the world.

13 Nonpolitical Ways to Fight for Liberty – Engage in Agorism

agorism

With only 10 days until the US presidential election, it seems like we’re counting down to our own extinction. Inside of politics, that may be true. Outside, however, the business of liberty is booming. If you’ve been following these 13 ways to fight for liberty before the election, you will already be using Bitcoin to break the Federal Reserve’s monetary control and practicing encryption to frustrate the NSA’s efforts to spy on your every word. Now it’s time to flip off the tax man and the regulatory bureaucracies. It’s time to try agorism.

Engage in agorism

Agorism is the act of engaging in counter-economic activity for the express purpose of defunding the state. Basically, that means doing business with people without paperwork and income reporting so that Uncle Sam doesn’t get any. The thought is, instead of wasting time trying to vote or repeal regulations to claim back a tiny bit of freedom from government, it’s way easier to just sneak that cash away without permission by dealing with grey and black markets.

The goal of agorism is an agora.the society full of unethical values like theft, assault, and fraud can become human which is close to a free society. Only in such type of a society, then only people can freely express their thoughts without crushing others feelings. This kind of a liberty is practiced in agorism. This internet site will be helpful to learn more about agorism and its theories.

Whether or not you know it, you’re already participating in the clandestine economy. Every time you buy cookies from a child’s bake sale, pay your (possibly illegal) immigrant landscaper in cash, or get gas money from your buddy for giving him a ride to the airport, that’s all off-the-grid. Agorism is just doing that intentionally, with the purpose of starving the government. So go out of your way to take work where you’re paid under the table, hire people for cash or Bitcoin without paperwork, and buy from unofficial vendors. If you’re really hardcore you can start your own business or become an independent contractor/freelancer where you have much more freedom to choose agorist work, but even if you can’t do that, don’t let it stop you from doing something. If a third of the country only pushes 10% of their economic activity underground, that’s like 10% of the population going dark, and the government gets a 10% budget cut. That’s a massive win for liberty. Make it happen.

Debt-Weary Millennials More Likely to Have Emergency Cash

More than other age group, millennials are more equipped to have funds available to use for unexpected expenses, indicating a generation weary and leery of debt.

According to a survey from Bankrate, 69% millennials were prepared to deal with emergency expenses by either dipping into savings or cutting back on spending, compared with an average of 61%. Among baby boomers, that number dips down to 56%, meaning that 13% of young people are better at dealing with unexpected financial responsibilities without going into debt than their parents.

Avoiding debt is a big priority for younger generations with lower incomes than their parents

The younger generations’ hesitancy to accrue additional debt may stem from both untenable levels of student loans and much lower prospects of paying them back. The millennial generation reportedly makes 20% less than their parents did at a similar stage in life, putting a significant damper on future prospects of easily handling accumulated debt.

Bernie Sanders famously campaigned on the promise of free college, capturing support from younger generations dreading having to shoulder a massive amount of debt for their education. As a result, Sanders captured the youth vote in the 2016 primary election by significant margins, garnering more under-30 primary votes than both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump (the eventual Democrat and Republican nominees) combined.

Managing the finances well is a sign that the millennial do not rely much on increasing their debt and largely increase the debt ridden nation in general. Pooling in their resources with careful planning and increasing their income is how young minds in college are working towards, who may not be weary of how much dent the nation is already in.

Increasing their earning capacity is more when a trend is compared to the elders who were making more money during their tenured service has decreased due to the value of currency and other factors, however with SnapCash Binary income solution is just a click away, easy sign up and trading to get the most desired high profit payout.

Older generations may have no social safety net if younger workers don’t support them

While the younger generations learn to value managing their finances without debt, the government programs their elders rely on for support see a consistently insolvent future. Social Security faces a $10 trillion shortfall, which only promises to worsen without any sort of major overhaul in the system. This is further impacted by the younger generations’ lower incomes, meaning less funding coming from workers to support a growing population of retirees.

Ron Paul: Whoever Wins the Election, Gold Goes Up

ron-paul

According to Ron Paul, whoever wins the election in November, gold will be the real victor.

The elder statesman of the libertarian movement and former Republican presidential candidate has remained apathetic about which major presidential candidate claims victory next month. However, he remains convinced that uncertainty will result no matter the outcome of the election, as he told CNBC in an interview:

“Politically speaking, there is going to be a lot more uncertainty and that may go into the markets. If people are depending on political stability to get the market going I don’t think it’s going to work out.”

Chaos is good for assets like gold

During times of high uncertainty, traditional markets tend to fare poorly, while assets like gold tend to fare well. Paul’s prediction of strong gold prices in the near future indicates that neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump will make the economy better off, and will instead do the opposite. During the run-up to the UK’s Brexit vote, leftist billionaire George Soros backed gold as a hedge against the coming economic uncertainty.

during the time when elections are around the financial world and the stock exchanges have a major shift in the way the indices and stocks move at a very crazily volatile manner that at times the experts fail to understand the black money angle which could be pumped in the exchanges making it zoom, assets like gold, digital currency are on all time deep fluctuations which make every single trade signal the most viable option for the traders to visit this website and understand a few stock movements.

Meanwhile, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan urged a return to the gold standard in order to combat what he sees as upcoming hyperinflation. If his predictions are correct, gold may very well see soaring prices in the near future.

Bitcoin is becoming “digital gold” in uncertain times

While gold remains the standard hedge against poor central bank performance, Bitcoin has recently joined as a prime contender. The distributed digital currency tracked gold’s price prior to Brexit, meaning that it too has become a hedge against uncertain economic times.

Unlike gold, however, Bitcoin can be more easily used for regular financial transactions. Sweden’s largest gold dealer famously ran into trouble when its bank accounts were abruptly closed. Bitcoin is not subject to such a vulnerability, as demonstrated by Uber’s switch to Bitcoin debit cards and other prepaid cards in the face of a government effort to make them cease operations in Buenos Aires.

Jury Nullification to Fight Victimless Crimes: Interview with Kirsten Tynan

A victimless crime is where a person breaks the law while harming no one. These can range from failure to pay fines, registration and paperwork mixups, morality laws, and more, however the most common and egregious example of victimless crimes is drug prohibition, where a person could potentially spend a lifetime locked away for perusing recreational substances in the privacy of their own home.

To combat this, activists have taken steps to inform jurors of their right to vote “not guilty,” even in cases where the defendant has clearly run afoul of the law, thereby nullifying an unjust law. In New Hampshire in particular, jury rights activists informed over 3,000 jurors of their right to nullify last year.

I interviewed Kirsten Tynan, executive director of the Fully Informed Jury Association (FIJA), about the importance of jury nullification in a free society.

The Desert Lynx: For the uninformed, what is jury nullification, elevator pitch version?

Kirsten Tynan: It is the right of every juror to vote Not Guilty for any reason they believe is just. In its strictest sense, jury nullification occurs when a jury acquits a defendant who has technically broken the law. Informally, however, you will also hear the term used to describe a hung jury that results when some but not all of the jurors vote Not Guilty despite the law having technically been broken.

Breaking the law is liberally is totally unjust, and so is criminalizing people who are just victims of unjust, mix up and false identities have long been punished without any fault of theirs, going back in history there are many who have been jailed in the freedom struggle just spent their life time in hell holes, full report on the profit making solution crypto currency traidn ga re listed in their website.

Does it work the other way around, when a juror declares a defendant guilty despite not finding them to have actually broken the law?

KT: Not exactly. Even though some people will reframe that scenario as “reverse jury nullification”, portraying it as though it is an equal and opposite scenario, reality is very different. The legal system was never meant to be an even playing field, but rather was purposely tilted to err on the side of liberty.
In the case of acquittal, a jury’s verdict is final and cannot be appealed by the prosecution. On the other hand, in the case of conviction, the defendant is allowed to appeal. So you can see in that scenario that there is extra protection to err on the side of liberty.

Hung juries are a similar story. In almost all criminal courts, a single juror can prevent a conviction by voting Not Guilty. (The defendant can be retried, but this is a far better scenario than conviction.) On the flip side, a single juror voting Guilty despite the defendant not having broken the law does not result in a conviction.
And I think it is far harder to find six or twelve jurors in today’s cultural climate to convict someone who had not broken the law than it is to find six or twelve conscientious people who will show mercy when the law is unjust to a defendant who has technically broken the law.

So rather than letting jurors make up the law, nullification facilitates no law (in that case). What’s to prevent jurors acting this way from creating a lawless society?

KT: Jury nullification has been grounded in English law since at least the 1600s, and it has been a part of the United States legal system for the entire history of the country. It was in 1670 that an English court established the principle that jurors cannot be punished for their verdicts, and that principle crossed an ocean and survived in our legal system to this day.

Despite centuries of jurors’ ability to nullify, somehow neither England nor the United States has descended into lawlessness. Is it a fluke? I don’t think so. Probably it has more to do with people actually wanting to live in a society free of real crimes such as murder or assault or rape. When there is a real victim who was harmed, people are more likely to be willing to enforce the law.

If anything, it seems like there’s very rarely an occurrence at all. Do most jurors know about their right to nullify?

KT: We don’t have data on the frequency of jury nullification, because that would be near impossible to gather. After their service, most jurors go back to their lives and we have no insight into their decisions or the reasons behind them.

Qualitatively, my sense is that it is uncommon, but probably not as rare as most people perceive it to be. FIJA currently has a project going to compile the most complete list of known and possible jury nullification cases anywhere online. We just had a summer fellow working on this project, and several of the cases he researched were within the last few years. But yes, it certainly is uncommon, and most jurors do not know about their right to nullify. Prosecutors now make a habit of filing motions in limine in any case they are prosecuting that would be likely to be viewed sympathetically by a jury in order to preclude any discussion that might even hint at their right of jury nullification. Judges do their part to mislead jurors with jury instructions worded so as to strongly imply and sometimes even outright falsely state that jurors must follow the law as the judge explains it to them.

I just recently saw a tragic case in Utah in which a juror came forth publicly expressing her regret for having voted Guilty on a few minor charges against a man named Jeremy Johnson. She said that because of the instructions to the jury, she believed she had no choice but to vote Guilty even though she believed no crime had been committed.

What steps are being taken to better inform jurors?

KT: Working with our supporters and allies, FIJA creates more fully informed jurors in many different ways.

One popular activity is juror rights outreach by handing out information near courthouses. Right now I believe there are long-term juror rights education campaigns going on in at least Colorado, New Hampshire, and Texas. We also have a signature day of action each year coming up on September 5 called Jury Rights Day commemorating that 1670 case I mentioned earlier. Volunteers go to courthouses nationwide on Jury Rights Day or another day close to that date to hand out brochures, hold signs, and answer questions about jury nullification.
We also do our best to arrange speakers for community groups and events where jury nullification information would be well received.

I have been working particularly diligently this year to add a lot more information to our website at FIJA.org, especially in the Library section. We also have a volunteer helping us to upgrade to a new, more user-friendly website that will be easier to navigate and learn from. We have the most active page I can find on Facebook specifically focused on jury nullification education and related jury issues, and we’re also working on improving our content offerings on YouTube. I have also started answering jury nullification and general jury-related questions on Quora to reach an entirely new audience there. One project I have in progress is a jury rights education online class that has been requested from us by several of our constituents. I’ve almost got the curriculum finalized, and then we will go forward with recording. We are also working on developing some new materials for publication both in print and electronically.

That’s a sampling of some of the things we have going at the moment. I have a few other projects that are kind of in the early stages, but keep in mind that at the moment FIJA has exactly 1 full-time staff person (me) and 2 very, very part-time people whose paid hours total less than a half-time staff person. We are almost entirely volunteer-driven, and none of this would be going on without the support of our generous volunteers and donors!

In your opinion, what’s the best “bang for your buck” form of activism?

KT: Something that puts jury nullification into the media in a positive light.
For example, juror rights educators in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, were getting harassed by courthouse officials for exercising their right to hand out jury nullification information on the public sidewalk. James Babb video recorded an encounter with an irate courthouse official, who also was in the wrong in demanding that juror rights educators must be banished to a far away “free speech zone”, in which he respectfully but firmly asserted his right not only with the courthouse official, but in conversation with a police officer who was called to the scene.
Not only was the video posted on YouTube where it is still viewable today, but the story was picked up by the local newspaper who ran it on their front page AND wrote an additional editorial in support of these volunteers’ right of free speech. That is a perfect example in which not only was the message amplified far beyond what volunteers could convey through their pamphlets, but the courthouse official then wound up helping make publicly visible the message he was trying to quash! There are a number of ways to get into the media including hosting a newsworthy event that is then covered, submitting an op ed, or even just writing a simple letter to the editor when there is a timely situation that connects somehow to the right of jury nullification. And that applies both with the traditional print and broadcast media, as well as with online media.

And finally, to wrap it all up: What’s at stake here? What happens if jurors don’t know their rights? What happens if they’re well-informed?

KT: Let’s look at this from two perspectives. On the accused person’s side, if they are convicted even of a minor offense, the consequences are far from minor. First, if convicted, a defendant’s personal relationships will be damaged. Their reputation in the community and among their peers will be tainted, their intimate relationships may be destroyed due to the added stress of the situation, and they may even lose custody of their children. If the penalty involves a fine, they may wind up losing property that is integral to their survival such as the roof over their head or a vehicle that is necessary for them to get to work. Fines that are not immediately paid can end up snowballing and even eventually lead to imprisonment.

If a person is imprisoned as a part of their sentence, understand that we have just put a possible death penalty on the table, no matter how minor their offense. They are at greater risk while incarcerated of physical and sexual violence, up to and including death. I have seen cases in which people died on their first day in jail or prison, due to medical neglect by staff who believed they were faking an allergic reaction or other condition. And even if they make it through their incarceration, once they are out, it becomes orders of magnitude harder to provide for themselves and their loved ones because their educational and employment opportunities are significantly curtailed. A conviction—even one which jurors think will result in a so-called ‘slap on the wrist’—can be life destroying.

But we should also consider this from jurors’ perspective. When we sit in judgement of another human being, holding their very life and liberty in our hands, we have great power and great responsibility. Although we will get to go home at the end of the case, we will have to get up everyday and live with the responsibility of how we treated that other person.
We get many calls and emails every year in the FIJA office and I see time and time again in the news stories from people who regretted their verdicts.

This can be five, ten, twenty years down the line. They are distraught by an error they have made, often unwittingly as they are misled into conviction by the judge and prosecutor. And I have to tell them there is very little they can do to remedy the situation. They cannot take back their verdict. They may be able to speak to the defendant’s attorney who may be able to do something with the information, but usually nothing will come of it. Somehow they must make peace with that situation for the rest of their lives.

On the flip side, with just two words a fully informed juror can literally save a life. Imagine that. I don’t know how much closer to a magic wand we can get in real life. The juror may experience some psychological pressure during deliberations, but they cannot be punished for their verdict. It is very low risk and one juror can at least hang the jury just by saying Not Guilty.

You Can Now Use Bitcoin At Dunkin Donuts

Bitcoin enthusiasts rejoice: you can now use it to get your coffee fix just about anywhere.

Ubiquitous coffee and breakfast chain Dunkin Donuts, which you can find just about every few blocks in New England, can now be patronized with Bitcoin, thanks to a recent gift card integration through eGifter. This allows customers to effectively pay with Bitcoin, even though the chain itself doesn’t yet take it directly.

If you still do not have these digital coins, then do not despair. There are many ways that can help you to get some digital coins easily, without worrying about super powerful computers and mining. Check it out, https://cybermentors.org.uk/bitcoincode-steve-mckay-bitcoinmillionaire-review/. This website reviews and endorses good trading programs for efficiency. This trading program helps everyone earn some cryptocurrency through its robotic system and has been appreciated by experts.

According to 2014 figures, there were a total of 2,243 Dunkin Donuts locations in New England, 215 of those in New Hampshire. Massachusetts is the clear heavyweight in the Dunks game with 1,151 locations, more than half the total of New England, and 10% of the global total of 11,500 spanning 40 different countries.

eGifter precise amounts makes it basically like using Bitcoin direct

eGifter is the first Bitcoin gift card app to add Dunkin’ Donuts to its repertoire. According to eGifter CEO Tyler Roye, the Dunks integration was inspired by the coffee habit of the company’s employees.

“The card was on our wish list since our first day in business. Many of the eGifter team members start every day with Dunkin coffee, also referred to around here as startup fuel. Those cups in our hands were a constant reminder that we wanted this card, so we are quite excited to finally be able to offer it to our members.”

Several other companies allow customers to purchase gift cards to major chains with Bitcoin, including Gyft and Fold. However, because of a unique feature with certain cards, eGifter allows customers to purchase precise amounts. Meaning, if you buy a coffee and a sandwich at Dunkin for $5.83, you can buy a $5.83 gift card with Bitcoin and have no balance left over. Bonus points for figuring out the exact total and buying the gift card while still in line so you don’t make people wait around for you to figure out your phone. Also, by using Bitcoin, you can save 3%. Final sweet trick: you can buy a gift card for someone else, meaning if your office buddy is out to get coffee and you decide halfway there that you want some, you can just send a gift card last minute to get your fix.

Adoption is one of Bitcoin’s biggest hurdles to clear

Bitcoin has all kinds of advantages over old-school money: it’s instant, infinitely divisible, decentralized, anonymous, and can’t be printed and therefore devalued by some unaccountable central authority. Best of all, it’s really convenient to use, as you can send any amount to anyone anywhere in the world almost instantly for very low fees. The one major setback from the layman’s perspective is that you can’t use it in the majority of stores yet. Gift card integrations like this, especially with major global chains, just make further adoption that much easier of a sell.